News that the US military branches are having trouble recruiting new volunteers has Democrats atwitter, but for the wrong reasons. They claim that the recruiting woes might make America "
weaker", or, as Jay Bookman of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution put it today, could mean trouble for "
the Army's long-term ability to perform its duties worldwide."
Bookman quotes poll numbers that show only 41 percent of Americans think the war is worthwhile, with 57 percent saying it is not. "And if Americans do not believe the war worthwhile, they're not likely to sign up to fight in it," Bookman writes.
Dems are always looking for an opening in Bush's armor, but this is not a Dem vs. GOP issue. The problem with the Iraq invasion is not that it is bogging down our military or hurting military recruitment goals – the problem is that the invasion was based on a campaign of deception to mask its true goal of ensuring corporate profits and power worldwide.
Imperialism is not, unfortunately, the sole domain of Bush and Co. Remember it is the Carter Doctrine that cemented our national interests in Middle East oil, and that President Clinton presided over the sanctions and bombings in Iraq that killed as many or more than has Bush's invasion.
And recall that Sen. John Kerry, during the presidential debates, promised only to fight the so-called "war on terror" harder than Bush and to stay in Iraq until the job was finished, without outlining what that meant.
If the media would focus harder on the real reasons for the invasion – say, at least with the same vigor and scrutiny it used covering the Terri Schiavo case – then popular support for the Iraq invasion would be even less.
More important, if the government would be less concerned with using the military to support US corporate interests across the globe, then we wouldn't need so many new volunteers. Currently the US spends as much on its military as does every other nation on the planet combined. It is not because we're more threatened or face invasions or attacks. Our forces are stationed all over the world, not defending America at home.
If anything, fewer military recruits might force the US to delay its invasion of Iran. Better still, it might force the government to institute a draft, at which point Americans will ask (loudly I hope), "why?" It's one thing when volunteers get sent to die for a lie, but it's quite another thing when your kids are being forced to do it. If it gets to that point, maybe people will start re-examiinng what Bookman called America's "duties worldwide."